I am told that I usually seem to have, as Margaret Laurence once put it, the “strength of conviction.” (Other people have been known to call it stubbornness.) But, you know, I don’t know everything. (I know!!!) Someone was telling me the other day that they thought there was really very little in life worth regretting. “Nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so,” this person said, grasping for depth, authority, I guess. No better place to go than Shakespeare.
In high school I had a crazy madman of an English teacher. I have succeeded in shedding most things from high school except the memories of this person. To my sixteen-year-old bookish self he was like Heathcliff, in more ways than one – there was always a hint of a storm cloud around his eyebrows.
I can’t say I was attracted to him, exactly, though perhaps my mind has whitewashed some schoolgirl crush. But he was the first person I’d ever met who did things like paper the walls of his classrooms with e.e. cummings poems. (Now that I think of it, in that time before the internet he had undoubtedly typed them out himself, an even greater sign of something-wrong-in-a-good-way.) So he had a sort of magnetism to him that, in college, I would realize, attaches to most people who are invested in some higher order of thing than themselves. At least, that quality is magnetic to me.
Don’t worry, this isn’t going to be a paean to the teachers in our lives who Make A Difference, who Change Young Minds, and Deserve Better Salaries for their trouble. Even were I tempted to write something so earnest, it wouldn’t do Mr. C— justice, because he openly despised everything in the world that so much as leaned towards the insipid.
The best memory I have from his classes, the one that presents itself at the most inopportune times, in fact, was him rebuking a student for observing that Biff, in Death of a Salesman, was “really sad, because he found out that his whole life kind of sucked.” (I’m paraphrasing; you get the idea.) Mr. C— eyed this poor soul carefully before breaking eye contact to stare out the window. This was his standard signal that a speech was coming on, and from what I remember this was quite a long one.
I could try to reproduce words, but the funny thing is that beyond a certain roughness and deep baritone, I no longer remember his voice very well. My memories of him depend less on who he was than on the things he said, and how he said them.
But what he said boiled down to this: Biff’s experience seems really terrible, yes, when he finds out that his dad was, in essence, an archetypal schmuck. It’s terrible to find out that people you admire are not what you think. But without that realization, Biff would have walked on thinking the world followed some kind of obvious story about how you Grow Up, become a Man, have a Family, and do Good ‘til you get to the end, usually a hospital bed when you die surrounded by your family. Living in a delusion doesn’t benefit Biff; it locked him into a kind of insincere existence.
This memory unfurled for the thousandth time when the person I started out this entry talking about said what she did. Because I understand getting tangled up in issues of regret, because you don’t want to think you’re a bad person but you also don’t want to be afraid to admit mistakes, because you’re closer to fine the less you seek your source for some definitive, because you have to seize the day, and because, as in the case of Mr. C— vs. the student that pitied Biff, it’s not always obvious what’s a good experience and what’s a bad one. I once tried to compliment a friend by telling her I found it admirable how unapologetic about herself she was, but I’ve also condemned public figures for being afraid to admit they were wrong as cowardly.
But I don’t know how to be consistent about all of these things that are true. I don’t think Mr. C—did either. I don’t know if he’s still teaching; some part of me thinks he isn’t. He didn’t much like it; it wasn’t him. He didn’t fit into that Make A Difference narrative, at least not in the traditional sense.
But I’m not sure he should regret it.
3 Comments so far
Leave a comment
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
I don’t generally like Death of a Salesmen. My parents hated it though, and I had to disagree that it was without merit. There’s that palpable sense of relief that the play has, when Willy dies, and Biff is suddenly free from this poisonous influence of his father. I liked that. I think that the mistake that too many people make with Salesman is making the tragic arc about Willy.
I had a religion professor in college that told a similar story about regretting and not regretting, only he used The Confessions of St. Augustine to illustrate it.
Comment by braak August 27, 2008 @ 3:28 pmThe thing about that Hamlet quote, it is true, but it’s coming from a madman, whether it’s pretend or not. It’s not a line that advocates no regrets; it’s a line that tells you thinking is depressing. Thinking is what makes the world what it actually is, and life without thinking isn’t really life. Hell, life without thinking you wind up with a dead mother, lover, cousin, uncle, and killing your stepfather. And if his philosophy was no regrets, well, let’s just say he regretted that as he died. Not exactly the best line to use in defense of a life without regrets.
Comment by John aspex August 28, 2008 @ 5:24 pm@John aspex
I’m not sure I buy this. Isn’t Hamlet’s preoccupation with thinking and consideration the reason that the play goes into Act Five? If he’d killed his stepfather when he’d had the chance, instead of thinking about it for five acts, he wouldn’t have a dead mother, lover, or cousin.
There’s a position in Zen thought that argues that what thinking does is exactly the opposite of making the world what it is–the world is always what it is. Thinking creates illusions that divorce us from that reality.
I always read that Hamlet quote as being a Zen expression–the world is, only according to its nature. The ideas of “good” and “bad” are artificial constructions that divorce consciousness from reality.
Comment by braak September 8, 2008 @ 2:36 pm